Table of Contents
Never had an engine issue. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just appeared like a diesel.
I wonder just how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time obtaining out of it's very own method ... the 300i6 would do whatever I need this vehicle to do patgizz composed: 3 things in the automotive globe refuse to damage.
those should be held as the standard to which everything else is determined. Almost every little thing else pales in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 certainly) Wow, because of the outpour of appreciation, it looked excellent so I purchased it, here's the ad lmk what you people think Oops, didn't imply to be puzzling, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz however, I'm fairly huge, and the guiding wheel to seat is rather narrow ... male that wheel cover was not ribbed for my enjoyment:-LRB- The only trouble I have actually ever before seen with trucks like that, are busted shifters. Ford made them a little also difficult and they would break right at the floorboard.
Maintain in mind the gas mileage won't be the best in the world, however it will certainly damn sure run forever. Never had an engine problem.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just appeared like a diesel. I question how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a hard time obtaining out of it's own way ... The engine bay had not been designed for anything longer than a Mod motor. One CAN eliminate an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, yet it draws.
"They are normally trustworthy as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine enjoys sludge? Knurled composed: wbjones composed: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck.
Rust is a different story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply sounded like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 freeway with the OD5. I question how hard a swap it would be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I didn't make clear ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I added that point because when I had to find a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go through each in every junkyard in South Jacket to discover one that had not been sludged up really terribly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to talk about a couple of problems of these vans, yet I I'm plainly not going to come out and claim one is better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. Let's speak regarding engine and in fact just to define that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I imply, these vans have been around for a lengthy time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around given that, you understand, around that time too. We're not going to obtain back right into, into the earlier stuff. Given that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are much extra preferred and I wouldn't really advise a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with strike to these engines, because they didn't have adequate threading in the spark plug, which caused troubles.
Extremely extremely cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I didn't explain ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I included that factor due to the fact that when I had to locate a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go through each in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that had not been sludged up really terribly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're mosting likely to speak about a couple of concerns of these vans, yet I I'm clearly not going to appear and state one is better than the other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are a few of the distinctions between these two brand names? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same lorry.
They appear to be a bit more used because location, but, you understand, those are a few of the uses, but they're basically the very same category of lorry. Mark: So, well, let's start with engines then. What concerns do you see in between these 2 vehicles? Bernie: Yeah. Allow's chat about engine and really just to specify that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I imply, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you recognize, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around since, you know, around that time too. Given that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
So, you know, Fords, and many of them come with the Triton V8. There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 ignition system with blow to these engines, since they didn't have sufficient threading in the ignition system, which created issues. And typically that would certainly occur when you may be in a 15 traveler bus increasing a hillside with a lots of individuals and all of an abrupt boom, an ignition system pops out and you're stranded.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer around Austin
Ford F150 dealer near me Austin, Texas
Ford F150 dealer